Debunking 9-11 Conspiracy Theories and Moving Forward for The...

Debunking 9-11 Conspiracy Theories and Moving Forward for The Betterment of America

From: Lance (Car Wash Guys Needs an America With a Sound Mind)
Remote Name: 66.82.48.1
Date: 11 Jan 2004
Time: 23:24:16

Comments

9-11 Conspiracy theories; We find amongst us a significant amount of people complaining about 9-11 and offering all sorts of Conspiracy Theories and we are all to well aware of the historical issues of such. And now we see many people screaming foul. There are stories attacking the Bush Administration for this, there are stories condemning the CIA and their involvement with the Bin Laden boy. There are theories of demolition devices on the twin tower buildings and Pentagon and that no airplane was actually there at all. On and on and on. No end to the condemnations or theories. I would like to comment on this after you review the information below. Here is what they say, which we are not buying, but this is what they proclaim as their proof: ---------------------- The following links are collected by a citizen, Gerard Holmgren, who wants the truth to come out on september 11 events. He doesn't have a web site and posts his link on forums, to mailing lists. I saved his message in html and give it here. List of links to documented evidence of high level US complicity in the attacks of sept 11 2001. (The Web pages below have been backed up. If any links are dead, the backed up page can be mailed on request.) ------- THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 Last updated June 14 2003 ----------------- Section 1: Airforce stand-down; 1:1 It has become popular mythology in the media that fighter jets were scrambled to intercept the hijacked planes. This is completely untrue as the following research shows. Guilty For 9-11: Bush, Rumsfeld, Myers, by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, 14 Nov 2001 http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-1.htm . 1:2 Mr. Cheney's Cover Story -- Section 2 of Guilty For 9-11, 20 Nov 2001 http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-2.htm 1:3 9-ll: Nothing Urgent, by George Szamuely, Research & documentation by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, Jan 2002 http://emperor.vwh.net/indict/urgent.htm 1:4 Planes "did scramble " on 9/11, they just "arrived late" http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/faq.htm 1:5 Scrambled Messages, by George Szamuely, 12 Dec 2001 http://www.nypress.com/14/50/taki/bunker.cfm 1:6 Air National Guard Mission and Vision statements http://nerdcities.com/guardian/SeptemberEleventh/ang-mission.htm 1:7 Russian Air Force chief says official 9/11 story impossible http://emperors-clothes.com/news/airf.htm Scrambling of fighter jets to intercept stray aircraft is a routine procedure. Here's an example of how routine it is. 1.13 Jet Sent to probe Fla. Gov. Plane. Netscape news. May 15 2003. http://channels.netscape.com/ns/news/story.jsp?floc=NW_2-T&oldflok=FF-APO-1110&idq=/ff/story/0001/20030515/001648315.htm&sc=1110&floc=NW_2-T The procedures were already in place before Sept 11 2001. It happened 67 times in the 10 months between September 2000 and June 2001. 1.8 Use of military jets jumps since 9/11. Associated Press Aug 13 2002. http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/completetimeline/2002/ap081302.html 1.9 CBS News. Scrambling to prevent another 9/11 Aug 14 2002 http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/08/14/attack/main518632.shtml 1.10 Preventing another 9/11 Military.com http://www.military.com/NewsContent/1,13319,FL_jet_081502,00.html 1.11 ABC News Jets on high Alert. Aug 13 2002. http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/homefront020813.html 1.12 Military now notified immediately of unusual air traffic events. Fox news Aug 12 2002 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,60245,00.html#top So on Sept 11, 2001 - Why were no fighter jets scrambled, and why has a cover up story been concocted? In the unlikely event that the airforce failed through incompetence, ( not once but 4 times! ) where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into car crashes at race tracks. -------------------- Section 2: Complicit behaviour of G.W.Bush It has become common mythology in the media that George W. Bush was at Booker Elementary School when he learned of the first WTC crash. This is a lie. Why is Bush lying about where he was, and what he knew? 2:1 Guilty for 9-11 Section 3: Bush in the open by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel. http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-3.htm This is not the only lie Bush has told about his movements that morning. See how many times he has changed his story. 2:2 Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve Grey. http://austin.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=2342&group=webcast (Read the section called "A tangle of lies") 2.3 Bush gets tangled in his lies Part 1. A strange press conference. By Jared Israel and Francisco Gil-White Sept 25 2002. http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/calif1.htm 2:4 Bush Gets Tangled in his 9-11 Lies, Part 2: White House Cover-up Creates More Problems than it Solves by Jared Israel and Francisco Gil-White [7 October 2002] http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/calif2.htm 2:5 The President as Incompetent Liar: Bush's Claim that he Saw TV Footage Plane Hitting WTC. Comments by Jared Israel [Posted 12 September 2002] http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/liar.htm Clinton was impeached for lying about an affair. Bush is lying about where he was, what he was doing and what he knew, during the crucial period between 8.45 and 9 AM on Sept 11. --------------------- Why did the President - after being told "America is under attack" continue to listen to schoolchildren reading for another 25 minutes ? Why was he cheering, smiling and joking even as it was known that at least one more hijacked plane was on the loose ? View the TV footage, which proves treason at the top level. 2:6 http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/vid.htm . ------------- Section 3: The Fictitious Hijackers If 19 Arabs hijacked the planes, why are there no Arabic names on any of the passenger lists? If they used non-Arabic aliases, which of the "innocents " on the lists are alleged to be the hijackers? 3:1 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA11.victims.html Passenger and crew list for AA 11 (first WTC crash.) 3:2 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html AA 77 (Pentagon crash) 3:3 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua175.victims.html UAL 175 (2nd WTC crash) 3:4 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua93.victims.html UAL 93 (Pennsylvania crash) If they are alleged to have been using non-Arabic aliases (19 obviously Arabic men got on board using non-Arabic ID, with 100% success rate ?), why did the FBI claim that they were traced through the use of credit cards to buy tickets in their own names? If 9 of the alleged hijackers were searched before boarding, as claimed in this article 3:5 http://www.policetalk.com/9_hijackers.html why is there no airport security footage of them? How did they (allegedly) get on board with knives, guns, AND electronic guidance systems, while being searched, but avoiding security cameras and not being on the passenger lists? What aliases were they alleged to be using when they were searched, and if they were not using aliases, why are they not on the passenger lists? What of reports that some of the alleged hijackers are still alive, and had nothing to do with the attacks ? 3:6 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm 3:7 http://www.rense.com/general20/alives.htm 3:8 http://www.muslimedia.com/archives/world01/afgwar-die.htm 3:9 http://www.americanfreepress.net/10_12_01/STILL_ALIVE__FBI_Mixed_Up_on_T/still_alive__fbi_mixed_up_on_t.html 3:10 http://www.corpust.com/CorpusTArchiveFBI70f19Alive.cfm 3.12 http://www.welfarestate.com/911/ 3.13 http://truedemocracy.net/td4/24s-c-6men.html 3.14 http://www.abqtrib.com/archives/news01/092001_news_trail.shtml 3.15 http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/23/widen 23.xml 3.16 http://www.worldmessenger.20m.com/alive.html 3.17 http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/NEWSTF/stfch11.htm 3.18 http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0109190363sep19.story?coll=chi-news-hed ------------- According to this article 3:11 http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:uEUylyDIXdYC:www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dallas/nation/9-11/stories/121202dnint911gas.928b2377.html+FBI+Agent:+Sept.+11+Hijackers+Probably+Used+Gas&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 ------------- the FBI now claims that the hijackers used gas to subdue the passengers and crew. If they used gas they would have been affected themselves – unless they had masks. The story gets better all the time. They somehow got on board with masks, gas, guns, knives and electronic guidance systems, in spite of being searched, didn't show up on the airport security cameras, and were not on the passenger lists. They left flight manuals in Arabic in rented cars outside the airport (last minute brushing up on the way there, about how to fly the things!) and then crashed the planes in breath taking displays of skilled piloting. Just to make sure we knew who they were, their passports were conveniently found in spite of fiery crashes which incinerated the planes and occupants. So they got on board with false IDs but used their real passports ? If the mythical Arab hijackers really were on the planes and airport security systems failed due to incompetence (not once but 19 times!), where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into racehorse doping scandals. ------------------ Section 4: More oddities; Why the official story concerning the hijacking of AA11 (first WTC crash) cannot possibly be true. 4:1 9/11 Redux: (The Observer¹s Cut) American . Airlines Flight 11, Re-examined By David L. Graham http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/redux.html Was an urban rescue team sent to New York the night before the attacks? 4:2 http://www.halturnershow.com/FEMA.htm 4:3 http://www.tpromo.com/gk/jun02/062602.htm 4.4 Former top German Cabinet Minister rejects official story of 9 11 attacks. Interview with Andreas von Buelow. Tagesspiegel Jan 13 2002. http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/VonBuelow.html National Security Advisor Rice and WhiteHouse spokesman Fleischer lied in saying that nobody had ever conceived of planes being used in this manner, their statements in this article, Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11; Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News May 16 2002 4:5 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html when the 1994 extract from Time magazine, quoted in article 2:1 demonstrates that the potential problem had been recognized for decades. And there are other examples of this possibility having been widely recognized prior to Sept 11. 4:6 "Omens of terror." by David Wise Oct 7 2001 http://www.hermes-press.com/omens.htm In article 4:5 Rice also lied in saying that any threat had been overwhelmingly perceived as being overseas. The statement she made is in this press briefing. 4:7 Press Briefing by National Security Advisor Dr. Condoleezza Rice. The James S. Brady Briefing Room May 16 2002 . 4.10PM EDT http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/05/20020516-13.html But this is the truth about the memo to which she refers. 4:8 August memo focused on attacks in the U.S. by Bob Wooward and Dan Eggen. Washington Post staff writers. May 18 2002. page A01. http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A35744-2002May17&notFound=true What did happen to Flight 93? by Richard Wallace. The Daily Mirror Sept 13, 2002 4:9 http://www.unansweredquestions.net/timeline/2002/mirror091302.html 4:10 http://www.thepowerhour.com/postings-three/flight-93-shot-down.htm 4.11 http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=12192317&method=full&siteid=50143 ------- Are cell phone calls from planes, of the type allegedly made by passengers on Sept 11 possible? 4:12 http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/project_achilles_report_1_030123.html 4.13 http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/project_achilles_report_2_030225.html ---------------- Section 5: Where is the evidence against Bin laden? Why is it that the US government doesn't feel confident enough of it's case against Bin laden to lay any formal charges, but keeps " finding" convenient video " confession" tapes ? Probably because new video technology makes it impossible to distinguish between a real video confession and a fake. When seeing and hearing isn't believing. by William M. Arkin. Washington Post Feb 1 1999 5:1 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/dotmil/arkin020199.htm Last word in High Tech trickery. by David Higgins Sydney Morning Herald. may 16 2002 5:2 http://smh.com.au/articles/2002/05/16/1021415016681.html For more detailed evidence of a preplanned agenda to fabricate evidence against Bin Laden, Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve Grey. 2:2 http://austin.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=2342&group=webcast (Read the section called "Evidence please !") It has become a common myth that Bin Laden has admitted to the attacks. This simply isn't true. Bin laden denies terror attacks and points finger at Jews. Annanova news. 5:3 http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm410936.html?menu=news.latestheadlines Bin laden denies attacks as Taliban talks holy war. ABC news online Sept 17 2001. 5:4 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2001/09/item20010917010639_1.htm Bin Laden denies being behind attacks. JS Online Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Sept 16 2001 5:5 http://www.jsonline.com/news/nat/sep01/binladen-denial.asp Osama Bin Laden claims terrorist attacks in USA were committed by some American terrorist group. Pravda Sept 12 2001 5:6 http://english.pravda.ru/accidents/2001/09/12/14910.html Bin laden Denies US attack says paper. Middle East News 5:7 http://www.metimes.com/2K1/issue2001-37/reg/bin_laden_denies.htm Bin laden says he wasn't behind attacks CNN Sept 17 2001 5:8 http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/index.html Bin Laden denies role in attacks. newsday.com Sept 17 2001 5:9 http://www.newsday.com/ny-wobin172369727sep17,0,7370581.story Taliban says Bin Laden denied role in attacks. Yahoo news Sept 13 2001. 5:10 http://www.welfarestate.com/binladen/denies-reuters-taliban.htm ----------------- Section 6: Insider trading reveals high level foreknowledge. In the first few hours after the attacks, it was reported that investigators were already looking into huge volumes of insider trading on airline stocks in the weeks leading up to the attacks. Why has this story since completely disappeared? Do authorities seriously expect us to believe that more than a year later, they still do not know who was responsible? Should not alarm bells have been ringing BEFORE the attacks with these record volumes of trading? If the executive director of the CIA had previously managed the firm which handled much of the trade, are we seriously expected to believe that he doesn't know who was responsible? Suppressed Details of Criminal Insider Trading Lead Directly Into The CIA's Highest Ranks -- CIA Executive Director `Buzzy' Krongard Managed Firm That Handled `Put' Options on UAL, by Michael C. Ruppert, 9 Oct 2001 6:1 http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/10_09_01_krongard.html Mystery of terror `insider dealers', by Chris Blackhurst, 14 Oct 2001 6:2 http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=99402 Profits of Death -- Insider Trading and 9-11, by Tom Flocco - Edited by Michael C. Ruppert, 6 Dec 2001 6:3 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FLO112B.html Where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into local government contract scandals. ---------------------- Section 7: The pentagon frame up and the WTC plane switch. It is alleged that American Airlines 77 (a hijacked Boeing 757) crashed into the Pentagon. A Boeing 757 is a very large aircraft with a wingspan of 125 ft and a length of 155 ft. So how did it make an initial hole 12 ft wide, collapsing only about a 35 ft depth of the outer ring of the building - and not leave any wreckage outside ? This photo of the damage to the Pentagon wall 7:1 http://66.129.143.7/june2aa.htm proves that whatever crashed into the pentagon was NOT AA 77, which demonstrates the Pentagon attack to have been a self-inflicted frame up. For a quick overview of the impossibility of the official story 7:2 http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm For a full physical analysis of the crash scene. Physical and mathematical analysis of Pentagon crash. by Gerard Holmgren Oct 2002 7:3 http://alberta.indymedia.org/news/2002/10/4578.php Why was there a concerted effort to fabricate eyewitness evidence for the official story regarding AA 77? Did AA 77 hit the Pentagon? Eyewitness accounts examined. by Gerard Holmgren June 2002 7:4 http://hamilton.indymedia.org:8081/front.php3?article_id=1786&group=webcast 7:5 The Pentagon crash hoax http://nerdcities.com/guardian/SeptemberEleventh/WhatHitThePentagon/ What hit WTC towers? Were they the planes we've been told ? ( AA 11 and UAL 175) http://whatzit.bravepages.com ----------------- Section 8: If the Attack on Afghanistan was a retaliation for Sept 11, why had it already been planned months before ? BBC News report by George Arney. 8:1 http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1550000/1550366.stm U.S. Planned for attack on Al -Qaida. White house given strategy two days before Sept 11. NBC news. May 16 2002 8:2 http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:A5WwRGMKgTYC:www.unansweredquestions.net/timeline/2002/msnbc051602.html+U.S.+Planned+for+attack+on+Al+-Qaeda.+White+house+given+strategy+two+days+before+Sept+11&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 . US planned to hit bin Laden ahead of September 11. By David Rennie in Washington 8:3 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2002/08/05/walq05.xml US Tells of covert Afghan plans before 9/11 By Bob Drogin LA Times May 18 2002 8.5 http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-051802strike.story Why were we originally told that the attack on Afghanistan was not planned prior to Sept 11,and was purely a retaliation to a " surprise " attack, and the story then changed after proof of the preplanned attack came to light ? ----------------------- Section 9: U.S. and Bin Laden co-operate behind the scenes. The new story is that they allegedly feared Bin Laden so much that they wanted to get him first. So why didn't they arrest him when they had the chance in July 2001? The CIA met Bin Laden while undergoing treatment at an American Hospital last July in Dubai, by Alexandra Richard, Translated courtesy of Tiphaine Dickson, Le Figaro, 11 Oct 2001 9:1 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/RIC111B.html 9:2 http://guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,584444,00.html 9:3 http://emperors-clothes.com/misc/lefigaro.htm ---------- Bin Laden met with the CIA in July and walked away by Michael C. Ruppert 9:4 http://www.rense.com/general16/bin.htm And why was the Bush family still in business with the Bin Laden Family, even AFTER Sept 11? Osama bin Laden's and Bush family Business Connections, Alliance With Pakistan Will Stimulate Drug Trade, Bring Revenues Under U.S. Control --Colombian Opium Production Will Soar; The Taliban's Biggest Economic Attack on the U.S. Came in February With The Destruction of Its Opium Crop by Michael C. Ruppert, 18 Sept 2001 9:5 http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/09_18_01_bushbin.html Carlyle profit from Afghan war, by David Lazarus, 2 Dec 2001 9:6 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/LAZ112A.html Elder Bush in Big G.O.P. Cast Toiling for Top Equity Firm, by Leslie Wayne, 5 Mar 2001 9:7 http://www.truthout.com/0662.Bush.Saudi.htm and The George W. Bush Money Tree 9:8 http://www.bushnews.com/bushmoney.htm . Bush Family's dirty little secret: President's oil companies funded by Bin Laden family and wealthy Saudis who financed Osama bin Laden, by Rick Wiles, Sept 2001 9:9 http://www.americanfreedomnews.com/afn_articles/bushsecrets.htm Arms Build-up Enriches Carlyle Group, Bush Sr. is Consultant, by Mark Fineman, 10 Jan 2002 9:10 http://www.truthout.com/01.11F.Arms.Carlyle.htm Gaping holes in the CIA V Bin Laden Story by Jared Israel 9:11 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/probestop-i.htm BushLaden by Jared Israel 9:12 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/bushladen.htm Addition to the above article 9:13 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/bushladen2-i.htm Judicial Watch: Bush/Bin Laden connection "has now turned into a scandal" Statement from Judicial watch with comments by Jared Israel 9:14 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/jw.htm 9:15 Bin laden. Terrorist monster: Take two ! by Jared Israel. Oct 9 2001 http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/taketwo-a.htm ---------------- 9:16 New Chairman of 9/11 Commission had business ties with Osama's Brother in Law by Michel Chossudovsky 27 December 2002 http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO212A.html And why did the US turn down an offer to extradite Bin Laden in 1996, AFTER naming him as wanted for the 1993 WTC bombing? --------------------- Section 10: The suspicious collapse of the World trade centre Towers. How did the WTC collapse? Why no serious inquiry? Why was the debris rushed away for recycling before any examination could be held? 10:1 Muslims suspend laws of physics by J. McMichael Nov 25 2001 http://www.public-action.com/911/jmcm/physics_1.html 10:2 Muslims suspend laws of Physics. part 2 by J.McMichael http://serendipity.li/wot/mslp_ii.htm "Burning Questions...Need Answers": Fire Engineering's Bill Manning Calls for Comprehensive Investigation of WTC Collapse, 4 Jan 2002 10:3 http://zgrams.zundelsite.org/pipermail/zgrams/2002-January/000200.html 10:4 http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/jan2002/markr19-12.htm 10:5 http://www.nyenvirolaw.org/PDF/FireEngineering-1-4-02-BurningQuestionsNeedAnswers.pdf 10:6 A firefighter says "we think there were bombs set in the building" http://people.aol.com/people/special/0,11859,174592-3,00.html 10:7 In Curious Battle: An expert recants on Why the WTC collapsed by John Flaherty and Jared Israel http://emperors-clothes.com/news/albu.htm 10:8 Documentary footage from the scene of the WTC attacks, and eyewitness accounts from firefighters at the scene reveal serious flaws in the official accounts. http://www.thepowerhour.com/postings/911-oddities-revealed.htm For a series of engineering articles and informative videos on the WTC collapse, see 10:9 http://home.attbi.com/~jmking/Collapse_update.htm 10:10 Evidence of explosives in South WTC Tower collapse http://la.indymedia.org/news/2002/12/23816.php 10:11 The World Trade Centre demolition http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/wtc-demolition.htm 10:12 Chapter 1 of the FEMA WTC collapse report (with comment) http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/WTC_ch1.htm 10:13 Chapter 2 (with comment) http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/WTC_ch2.htm 10.14 The jet fuel. How hot did it heat the World trade Center? http://www.uscrusade.com/forum/config.pl/read/1064 10.15 Proof of controlled demolition at the WTC by Jerry Russell, Ph.D. http://www.attackonamerica.net/proofofcontrolleddemolitionatwtc.htm 10.16 Where's the inferno? http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_fire.htm Steel melts at 1539 degrees. Jet fuel (kerosene) burns at 800 degrees. Are we seriously expected to believe that burning kerosene towards the top of the building (heat travels upwards) somehow caused both towers to neatly implode in a manner identical to that of a controlled demolition ? Where is the inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into suburban housefires. Why is discussion of the possibility of a controlled implosion completely taboo? Why do authorities keep inventing ridiculous stories about burning jet fuel melting steel? ------------- Section 11: Hands off Bin Laden ! Why were the FBI told to not investigate the Bin Laden family links in the US? Has someone been sitting on the FBI? Transcript of a BBC News night Report on "the questionable links of the bin Laden Family," 6 Nov 2001 11:1 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/BBC111A.html 11:2 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/probetrans.htm (added comments by Jared Israel) Bush thwarted FBI probe against bin Ladens, Hindustan Times, 7 Nov 2001 11:3 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/HIN111A.html US efforts to make peace summed up by `oil', by Lara Marlowe, 19 Nov 2001 11:4 http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MAR111A.html 11:5 http://www.fisiusa.org/fisi_News_items/news369.htm Called Off the Trail? FBI Agents Probing Terror Links Say They Were Told, ‘Let Sleeping Dogs Lie’ By Brian Ross and Vic Walker. ABC News Dec 19 2002 11:6 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers021219.html After capturing one of the six most wanted Taliban leaders, the US then let him go. "By mistake " of course, because of "flawed intelligence." 11:7 Taliban general 'freed by mistake' Sunday Times Dec 19 2002 http://www.sundaytimes.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,7034,5704967%255E15574,00.html 11:8 US accidentally set wanted Taliban Leader free. Clari news dec 18 2002. http://quickstart.clari.net/qs_se/webnews/wed/bn/Qus-attacks-taliban.RVGa_CDI.html ------------- 11:9 FBI agent Robert Wright says FBI assigned to intelligence operations continue to protect terrorists from criminal investigations and prosecutions. Judicial Watch Sept 11, 2002. http://www.judicialwatch.org/2469.shtml ------------------- Section 12: Its really not so surprising. In 1962, the joint chiefs of staff approved a CIA plan to commit terrorist acts against the US and frame Cuba. Friendly Fire -- Book: U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba, by David Ruppe, 1 May 2001 12:1 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.html Pentagon Proposed Pretexts for Cuba Invasion in 1962, The National Security Archive, 30 Apr 2001 12:2 http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/ North woods - a plan for terror to justify war. Comments by Jared Israel. 12:3 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-int.htm Scanned images of the actual document. 12.4 Page i http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-i.htm 12.5 Page ii http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-ii.htm 12:6 Page iii http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-iii.htm 12.7 Page 1 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-1.htm 12.8 Page 2 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-2.htm 12.9 Page 3 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-3.htm 12.10 Page 4 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-4.htm 12.11 Page 5 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-5.htm 12.12 Page 6 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-6.htm 12.13 Page 7 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-7.htm 12.14 Page 8 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-8.htm 12.15 Page 9 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-9.htm 12:16 Page 10 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-10.htm 12.17 Page 11 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-11.htm 12.18 Page 12 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-12.htm . US military schemes- ominously like 9/11. 12:19 http://emperors-clothes.com/misc/bamford.htm If such tactics were considered normal and acceptable practice by the Government in 1962, what evidence is there that things have changed? Henry Kissinger advocated a similar strategy in 1992 12:20 http://www.spotlight.org/Newsbureau/Prisoner/Media/media.html as Did Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1997. A War in the Planning for Four Years. HOW STUPID DO THEY THINK WE ARE? Zbigniew Brzezinski and the CFR Put War Plans In a 1997 Book - It Is "A Blueprint for World Dictatorship," Says a Former German Defense and NATO Official Who Warned of Global Domination in 1984, in an Exclusive Interview With FTW by Michael C. Ruppert 12:21 http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/zbig.html . ---------------- Section 13: Who created and funded the Al Qaeda Network? A Vital Piece of the Puzzle: Dollars for Terror -- The United States and Islam, by Carol Brouillet. 13:1 http://www.communitycurrency.org/vital.html Bin Laden in the Balkans - Collection of mainstream media articles. Compiled by Jared Israel 13:2 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/binl.htm The Creation called Osama by Shamsul Islam 13:3 http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/creat.htm "Articles documenting US creation of Taliban and Bin Laden's terrorist network" Series of links to different articles 13:4 http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/doc.htm "Osama Bin Laden: Made in USA" by Jared Israel 13:5 http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/madein.htm "Bush and the media cover up the Jihad schoolbook scandal" by Jared Israel 13:6 http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/jihad.htm U.S. Protects Al-Qaeda Terrorists in Kosovo, by Umberto Pascali, 2 Nov 2001 13:7 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/PAS111A.html Which Terrorists are worse? Al Quaeda? Or the KLA? by Jared Israel 13:8 http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/kla-aq.htm --------------- Section14 : Who created the civil war in Afghanistan? Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter's National Security Adviser [Posted 6 October 2001] Ex- National Security Chief Brzezinski admits: Afghan war and Islamism were made in Washington 14:1 http://emperors-clothes.com/interviews/brz.htm -------------- Section 15: Why have the President and Vice President resisted moves for an inquiry into Sept 11? Bush asks Daschle to limit Sept. 11 probes -- CNN Jan 29 2002. 15:1 http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/29/inv.terror.probe Bush, GOP blast calls for 9/11 inquiry. CNN May 17 2002 15:2 http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/05/16/president.gop.senators Daschle: Bush, Cheney Urged No Sept. 11 Inquiry Reuters newswire UK May 26 2002 15:3 http://www.newsfrombabylon.com/article.php?sid=1680 Bush and Cheney Block 9-11 Investigation By Mike Hersh Oct 24, 2002, 2:22pm 15:4 http://www.mikehersh.com/Bush_and_Cheney_Block_911_Investigation_.shtml Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11; Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News May 16 2002 4:5 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html 15.5 Bush opposes 9/11 query panel. CBS News. May 23 2002. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/15/attack/main509096.shtml 15:6 9/11 Panel asks what briefers told Bush. White House retreats on independent probe. Dana Priest and Dana Milbank. Washington Post Sept 21 2002. Page A01 http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A46446-2002Sep20&notFound=true -------- 15.7 White House refuses to release Sept 11 info. by Frank Davies Miami Herald May 5 2003 http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/5792329.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp ----------------------- --------------- ---------------- Now then I would like to make some comments on all of this. This collection of news articles raises some good questions as to: 1.) If there was a conspiracy, how anyone could be so bad at covering their tracks doesn't it? 2.) We know from studying the past and evolution and archeology that usually the most simple explanation is usually the one which is correct. 3.) If there was a huge amount of conspiracy where are the conspirators since no one can ever keep a secret in the era of whistle blowers. 4.) If there was a conspiracy it is over and therefore we all ought to get onto the same page and unite in a common cause and therefore what is the point now after the fact and who does it serve to bring up these charges based on speculation?> ----- We should be better than that, it would not surprise me if we knew about it or had theorized that something like this could happen. Tom Clancy wrote about a Japanese Airline pilot who had lost two sons in a fictitious war crashing into the White House in D.C. and of course History shows worse doesn't it? December 7, 1941. We know there was more to that story? But you know, I have been in the news all my life. Never once did the reporter get the whole story correct. Mostly they got most of it or a good part of it, but never all of it. So quoting news articles to make a point actually weakens the argument completely. http://www.carwashguys.com/history/museum1.shtml and http://www.carwashguys.com/innews.html . So it is interesting in that some one who is a conspiracy theorist would use the media for verification of their theories, when the media is the one they believe is in on most of the conspiracies in the first place you see. I find conspiracy theorists will usually in their writings claim that the cause of all the bad things are in part due to the media and then in another instance use the media in their writings to justify their position and in this case show examples to prove a point using the same media. And selective articles carefully chosen, I might add. One of the strongest claims made in Regards to the Pentagon attack crash and where are the parts to the plane is interesting question indeed. But then again one who studies fire science and inertia or the explosive characteristics of missiles and ordinance would disagree with the claim that since there are no visible parts to the airplane, there could not have been any aircraft at all? What based on a picture from a couple viewpoints after the huge crash? There is usually not much left of aircraft in controlled crashes much less one flown into a building. Now there is also a phenomena which is a vacuum induced imploding vortex which is commonly referred to a back draft in firefighting and can be mathematically figured in ordinance damage assements through computer modeling pre-event using several algorithms and looking at the kinetic energy of a 757 at 400 knots, not to mention full of fuel scattered in the path of distructions. Remember it hit the parking lot and skipped into the building. So the debris would have followed behind the aircraft which already had it’s wings ripped off and had the rest of it of it passing the aircraft slowed by the hitting of the ground first then flung towards the building and then cart-wheeling into the building and sucked into the area where the explosion took place. The fuel was in the wings and dumped most of that as it skipped across the reason again for the burned ground when the aircraft was moving through what we know as the Pentagon outer walls. So this comment is irrelevant and before waving the issues of conspiracy someone ought to be smart enough to think through these issues. Now realize I am not debating these findings of this conspiracy theorist or the other possibilities that there was no aircraft. I just would like some proof of no aircraft before anyone starts pointing fingers. And throughout time we have seen civilization and leaders play the people against each other and the masses and gang mentality to incite action, which behooves the said liars for reasons of power, wealth, etc. However this does not appear to be one of those times. We know the Bin Laden boy wanted to get those trade towers after trying before. It was a goal of his and sure enough he figured out a way, much to our incompetence in stopping it. It only makes since that they would try for other targets as well. I hate to debunk all this hard work, but it makes less sense than what we have seen on the issues. So this so-called revelation is not a revelation at all, merely the smoke and mirrors of diplomacy. Diplomacy being: "The Art of Letting Someone Else get your Way!" You see. In other words, what exactly is the point in pointing out all of this stuff and innuendos and conspiracy thoughts, who does it serve? It hurts the country more to reveal this if in fact there are other issues at play and other unknown circumstances, than to let it be even if it is true and if the actual happenings and greater possibility of the this and other conspiring conspiracy theorists being totally off base and wrong then they are dividing a country, which is an actual conspiracy against the unity of America. The county and it’s strength lie in the people’s hearts and minds, which now more than ever is a reason to stand tall and proud against adversity and use such tragedy to bring itself together, which is what I propose is the best tact. Bring the country together and then the world together in that order starting here and now. Surely we may have known all about this and even accidentally assisted a bit for all we know and judging from the allowing of commercial simulators to be used by International Terrorists leaves much to wonder. But it is not for us to know. Surely it is a bummer if any of this is true and a shame that one or two half truths are missed in with all this conjecture, but perhaps there are reasons even deeper in a bigger over all plan, which we are neither privy too? If this information is partially correct then it is unfortunate to say the least. But partially does not mean conspiracy and it is not a justification to condemn our leadership or our own team. This clearly serves not greater purpose. And isn't that the nature of the human species? And shouldn't we just understand the way things are and have always been rather than calling leaders liars or casting stones when all live in glass terrarium houses? It is not a perfect World as we know or ought to realize from our personal experiences. Maybe we should just leave it at that? Looking at those headlines and articles and scanning their content, I say, yes obviously there are some issues which are so blatant you have to wonder why they were not covered better if they are true and other issues you have to laugh at and some which make you cry that it was so obvious that no one picked it up. Or that the communication breakdown between fiefdoms in enforcement agencies is so pathetic you want to just shoot someone. But in the end isn't it just business as usual? Should we really expect anything different, after all we see things in our daily live regarding incompetence in business, education and government bureaucracies all the time. It just is after all. Isn't it easier to do good than to be good? And therefore shouldn't we work on the being good rather than pointing fingers in disgust. One might bring up and mention Karma, so in that regard what goes around comes around, right? And if so shouldn't we all, that means those conspiracy theorists amongst us too, be working on more positive things than dwelling on all this negative energy? Like finding a way to fix the malaria issue, make clean water for the world or removing land mines? The most intellectually challenged people talk about people. (These conspiracy theorists keep talking about George W. Bush and other members of the establishment) The next level of human intellect talks about events. (9-11 is certainly and event, yes. The conspiracy theorists are discussing WTC attacks and Crazy Cows) . I want the world to join me in talking about and discussing concepts, solutions and moving the ball forward for the betterment of mankind. I, you, we; cannot change the past in this dimension in our linear time, we should therefore bury the hatchet and let's fix the things we can, by joining together and getting it done. Perhaps maybe I am too well read and see all the issues of history keep repeating over and over again. http://www.carwashguys.com/0021803_2.shtml (the good, bad and the ugly side of all we are and all we have built. I do not attempt to justify the history of my ancestors or my species, only that it doesn't matter who you are or how you got there...because there you are. You see?). The conspiracy theorists and name callers have always existed, but it appears to me that these things are simply normal cycles of civilization, like the Solar Cycle often mentioned on the message board, which is sure to change something. These cycles will continue until we do something to change it. What can we do? Well these vicious cycles we point out in history do have some good news to them? When we find a reason to spend money on R and D, we end up advancing man kind. For instance Jet Airliner Travel from the jet engines first flown in Germany in WWII and the Japanese research and development. Microwave ovens, space travel, nuclear power, television, radar, Laser ring Gyros, GPS, on and on. You see, are these not worthy items for the betterment of humanity to progress the species? Only 1% of the people who have ever lived on the planet have died in a war. War is hell, it is a fact we live with. But it has also bettered our species in many ways. That is also a truth, whereas these conspiracy theorists have taken fact out of context and turned it to fiction, they have carefully selected random clippings which were the extreme end of the spectrum not the mean average of the time, meaning it is a very skewed view of what we saw and heard during our present period. If we allow such conspiracy theories to condemn without proof we are no better than the International Terrorists, which attempt to divide us and conquer us using our own fear as the weapon. We should not allow our own people or team to divide us otherwise we will have defeated ourselves and served the will of our enemy but rendering our hearts and will to that of self inflicted negative biofeedback making us weak in our resolve this we will have come so far in all we are and all we have built merely to tear down the greatest civilization ever created in the history of human kind. So those are my thoughts on this matter, care to opine? Lance@carwashguys.com

Site hosted by CCG

Site design by CCG Studio

DISCLAIMER:
Although we exert control over all articles written by our staff and consultants, we are in no way able to assure the accuracy of any content generated by our readers. Any information or advice provided by our readers should be used cautiously, and should be considered as an opinion of such, and not the views, ideas, opinions, or advice of Washguy.com. Washguy.com., its staff, and consultants shall in no way be held liable or responsible for any false or misleading information or injurious advice obtained from our readers, including any information posted to this Bulletin Board forum. Any information or advice obtained from other readers through Bulletin Board postings shall be used at the reader's own risk. The Bulletin Board forum functions as a discussion group for the exchange of views, information and opinions on issues related to the Car Wash Guys, Franchising and their associated topics. Washguy.com, its staff, and consultants will not be held liable for any incidental or consequential loss or damage sustained as a result of this information or advice. No user shall be entitled to claim detrimental reliance on any views received from the staff, consultants or other readers. By using this Bulletin Board and it's related forums, you agree to indemnify and hold Washguy.com, its staff and consultants harmless from any claims arising as a result of your use of the information or materials you download from or upload to the Bulletin Board.